Tools #Open models#AI agents Oct 23, 2026 · Originally published Oct 22

SageMaker AI training sessions are generally available: write your own post-training loop and reward function while AWS runs the GPUs, billed by tokens processed

Reinforcement learning on open-weight models gets easier to start. What you write, what AWS runs, and how it bills.

Primary source AWS Machine Learning Blog · aws.amazon.com Read the original ↗

// Key points

  • Training sessions extend SageMaker AI serverless model customization: you write the training loop, custom loss and reward signals, and SageMaker AI handles GPU allocation, distributed execution, fault recovery and checkpoint storage.
  • SFT, DPO, RLVR, RLAIF and multi-turn RL are supported, with LoRA or full fine-tuning. The reward function runs in your own environment, where it also connects the agent to its tools or simulators.
  • You pay for the tokens SageMaker AI processes; the meter stops while your reward function scores a batch, and there's no capacity to reserve.
  • A companion cookbook ships model-customization agent skills that work in SageMaker Studio, Kiro, Claude Code, Codex and GitHub Copilot.

Builder's takeNot paying while your reward function scores matters a lot for multi-turn agent training: a slow evaluation environment no longer burns GPU money. I'd take an end-state reward like the ThinkingBox one in the next item, run a few dozen steps on a small open model to see the curve, and only then decide whether a fixed task deserves its own specialized model.

// Background · from #Open models

Full timeline →
  1. Oct 22 NVIDIA opens Kumo Relational, which predicts churn and fraud directly on relational databases without training and beats supervised pipelines on 41 tasks across 15 databases
  2. Oct 22 IBM releases Granite Speech 5.0 2B under Apache 2.0, with a 5.06% average English WER and keyword biasing for up to 2,000 terms
  3. Oct 22 Dharma AI rebuilds a fine-tuned Qwen3-4B's vocabulary around token cost, cutting a production essay grader's measured inference cost 77%